Mark Bauerlein and Neil Howe both made some good points in
this video. My first thought was that a
person can usually find any research to back up his or her point. This is somewhat frustrating for me because
it makes it harder to decide who is “most correct” in their claims. In this case, I see truth in both arguments,
but it is Bauerlien’s argument that rings most true for me because I see much evidence
to support his claims in the high school where I teach.
The thesis of Bauerlein’s book, The Dumbest Generation, is that when habits and leisure time of the
Millennial Generation are traced, it seems that there is a decline in
intellectual habits and intellectual pursuits during their free time, even
though this generation has many advantages over the generations that have come
before them to acquire knowledge and skills.
Basically, the Millennials are reading much less, and yet they spend an exorbitant
amount of time social networking.
Neil Howe cites evidence that the Millennials are getting
smarter, and the two that stick out in my mind are spelling B words and science
fair projects of today, as compared to the 1950’s. Bauerlein dismisses this evidence saying that
we have about 10% of the Millennial generation that are superkids, and this is
merely their data…not the data of the majority.
Again, what Bauerlein says rings true.
When I talk to my students, it seems that they want to do the least
amount of work possible, and when they get home, few choose to read. They are on Facebook or playing video
games. The readers, of course, stick out
as the star pupils in class because they are sharpening their tools for
learning.
So, I guess I am a Millennial, as I was born in 1982. In high school, I wasn’t challenged enough in
my classes to need to study extra time at home.
However, I remember doing research papers in my English classes, and
having to read novels (some of which I was not interested in and chose not to
read.) My question is, how can we help
these kids develop an internal gratification from learning? Kids of the Millennial Generation are less
likely to do things just because the teacher said so. They want to know why things are important,
and if there is no reason, they won’t waste their time. I was an A student in high school (with the
exception of a couple of B’s, but I didn’t show real motivation for learning
until I was in college. I don’t think
this shift in motivation was because I changed significantly in my values. It was because I chose my classes, and I was
challenged in those classes.
Millennials have so many choices when it comes to how to
spend their free time, and there are so many distractions for Millennials, as
pointed out by Bauerlein. Millennials
have computers, cell phones, television, dvr, playstation, the list goes on and
on….so much technology, and the majority of them seem to use it just for
play. But my question is, have they been
taught to do anything else with these devices?
Do teachers give them enough meaningful assignments to complete on the computer
that they understand HOW they can use this tool for something other than
Facebook? That is my challenge to
teachers and to the central office. We
need technology in the classroom if we are going to teach our students to be
responsible users of technology.
Hey Erin, I totally agreed with the fact of skewing evidence in favor of whatever you are fighting for. Since going back to school, that is one major things I have learned. Also, I like the fact that you pointed out that students have to be taught to use these technological devices for educational purposes. Any technological device can be used negatively or postitively.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that we, as educators, have to show students how to use these technologies if we expect them to use them for anything beyond social networking. What I don't want to see, however, is a shift to all work being done on computers with limited human interaction. Credit recovery can be completed entirely by computer, and that could easily seep into other areas. In ten years, where will we be?
ReplyDeleteI agree we need to make students want to learn the material and I truly believe the best way to do that is by making it have a personal and meaningul connection to their lives .... without a connection, students are not interested. I also think college professors demonstrate how we can use Facebook and blogging for the advantage of the classroom but we have yet to see that happen in the high or middle schools.
ReplyDeleteI also do not want to see the human elements taken out of education. This class is strange to me, I have to admit, because there is no face-to-face meeting and it is strange only being able to interact from a distance. So much gets lost, from tone, to attitude, to jokes, etc., but we do get to get something from these interactions (I hope) from the writing.
ReplyDeleteMy concern is that sometimes in education we get so caught up in how we used to do things that we do not look at how we can do things. It does not help that facilities and resources (and the policies for that matter) are slow to keep up. We can't always be on the "cutting edge" (and I HATE that term), but I think we can do a better job of adjusting what we want to accomplish to how students can and do operate in their lives.
I agree that data can become skewed but that's what we use to determine things, its sad but true. The people outside of the classroom do all of this research it seems.
ReplyDeleteI couldn't agree more. Both authors make great points. I think what it really boils down to in terms of utilizing print and technology is making it meaningful, relevant and practical for the student. I can remember reading Beowulf in highschool and having to recall the specific sword exchanges and thinking why on earth is this important. Both print and technology have their place in the classroom, it is up to us to make it meaningful for our students.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with you about the challenge thing. I was Valedictorian of my high school class, but I also had a very long disciplinary record. My bad behavior stemmed from the fact that I was bored. However, the boredom was not simply the result of the lack of challenging material. There was also a great issue of relevancy. I found nothing to be profoundly relevant in my life. As you said, it was not until college that I found both the challenge and relevancy I required.
ReplyDeleteI agree! Students know how to use technology for social interaction, but are lacking the skills with technology in the classroom.
ReplyDelete